i don't know how the wef thought that giving leaders of multinational corporations some sort of dominant say over the shape and direction of the world was a good idea.. it sounds like a very bad idea in fact.. no wonder no ordinary person is onside with the thinking coming out of the wef.. the sooner this organization goes away - the better..
Hi Ismaele thankyou for the articles. Both very interesting. I hope you write an article soon that says what the second article says, about the main villian in the first article - NATO I heard once that NATO was supposed to be the one world government military. Trump's proably heard that too. What I don't understand is the zionists here. Trump is a zionist and so is Schwable. It seems to me there's a split in this oligarchy situation which is both Trump and Davos. Some leaders adhere to the WEF - like Biden and some are the Israeli gangster group like Trump. Actually I heard this idea first from Kevin Barrett I think.
It sounds like Davos Man achieved his goals to the detriment of all of us. How do wrest power back from the corporate class?
"The major players in the transatlantic system are realising that the World Economic Forum, after more than 50 years of existence, no longer wields the power it once did. Indeed, as Harley Schlanger points out in a recent article for EIR, the Davos gathering was launched by Klaus Schwab in 1971, under the name European Management Forum, to build a consensus on “globalisation” among the leaders of multinational corporations. This included an attack on the idea of national sovereignty as an outdated idea and a commitment to the emergence of a world order under the governance of corporate cartels.
The coordination of this new order was to be entrusted to those whom the late Samuel P. Huntington had identified with the term “Davos man”, writes Schlanger. Huntington, known for his geopolitical theory of the Clash of Civilisations - which is an updated version of Thomas Hobbes' vision of the world as a battlefield of “all against all” - wrote in 2004 that the Davos Man has “little need for national loyalty, sees national borders as obstacles that are fortunately disappearing, and sees national governments as remnants of the past whose only useful function is to facilitate the global operations of the elite”."
i don't know how the wef thought that giving leaders of multinational corporations some sort of dominant say over the shape and direction of the world was a good idea.. it sounds like a very bad idea in fact.. no wonder no ordinary person is onside with the thinking coming out of the wef.. the sooner this organization goes away - the better..
🤞🤞🤞
Hi Ismaele thankyou for the articles. Both very interesting. I hope you write an article soon that says what the second article says, about the main villian in the first article - NATO I heard once that NATO was supposed to be the one world government military. Trump's proably heard that too. What I don't understand is the zionists here. Trump is a zionist and so is Schwable. It seems to me there's a split in this oligarchy situation which is both Trump and Davos. Some leaders adhere to the WEF - like Biden and some are the Israeli gangster group like Trump. Actually I heard this idea first from Kevin Barrett I think.
It sounds like Davos Man achieved his goals to the detriment of all of us. How do wrest power back from the corporate class?
"The major players in the transatlantic system are realising that the World Economic Forum, after more than 50 years of existence, no longer wields the power it once did. Indeed, as Harley Schlanger points out in a recent article for EIR, the Davos gathering was launched by Klaus Schwab in 1971, under the name European Management Forum, to build a consensus on “globalisation” among the leaders of multinational corporations. This included an attack on the idea of national sovereignty as an outdated idea and a commitment to the emergence of a world order under the governance of corporate cartels.
The coordination of this new order was to be entrusted to those whom the late Samuel P. Huntington had identified with the term “Davos man”, writes Schlanger. Huntington, known for his geopolitical theory of the Clash of Civilisations - which is an updated version of Thomas Hobbes' vision of the world as a battlefield of “all against all” - wrote in 2004 that the Davos Man has “little need for national loyalty, sees national borders as obstacles that are fortunately disappearing, and sees national governments as remnants of the past whose only useful function is to facilitate the global operations of the elite”."
How to deal with dollar as a reserve currency in a world that is no more unipolar?