In the scope of things not much will change the Netanyahu regime long term course of action, nor US support. In regards to Biden perhaps a token face saving measure as the AIPAC pro jewelry controlled US Congress is taking some heat as the genocide continues, imo.
It's too early to say if anything will change, especially in the long term. Let's see first what happens in the next few days. If nothing changes, then you are right. If Israel stops the carnage, it's a good sign towards the right direction.
Surely the US could have vetoed the resolution, as they did in the past. The fact that they have not and abstained instead is quite remarkable, in my opinion - it suggests a shift in policy or, at least, a change in attitude towards the situation in Palestine, though the latest statement of the White House’s spokesperson, John Kirby, says otherwise:
"We have been clear, and we’ve been consistent in our support for a ceasefire as part of a hostage deal. That’s how the hostage deal is structured. We wanted to get to a place where we could support that resolution, but because the final text does not have key language that we think is essential like a condemnation of Hamas, we could not support it."
Yesterday, ICJ ordered Israel to action food supplies to Gaza, and to work with the UN.
I see your on top of this, yes let's watch what happens.
Yes, I follow both situations in Palestine (and the wider Middle East) and Russia-Ukraine quite actively.
Excellent.
In the scope of things not much will change the Netanyahu regime long term course of action, nor US support. In regards to Biden perhaps a token face saving measure as the AIPAC pro jewelry controlled US Congress is taking some heat as the genocide continues, imo.
It's too early to say if anything will change, especially in the long term. Let's see first what happens in the next few days. If nothing changes, then you are right. If Israel stops the carnage, it's a good sign towards the right direction.
Surely the US could have vetoed the resolution, as they did in the past. The fact that they have not and abstained instead is quite remarkable, in my opinion - it suggests a shift in policy or, at least, a change in attitude towards the situation in Palestine, though the latest statement of the White House’s spokesperson, John Kirby, says otherwise:
"We have been clear, and we’ve been consistent in our support for a ceasefire as part of a hostage deal. That’s how the hostage deal is structured. We wanted to get to a place where we could support that resolution, but because the final text does not have key language that we think is essential like a condemnation of Hamas, we could not support it."